Clinical determinants of clinical response to Sonidegib in advanced basal cell carcinoma: a monocenter experience.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical determinants of complete response in locally advanced basal cell carcinoma (laBCC) patients receiving Sonidegib in a real-life, retrospective, observational study.  Hedgehog pathway inhibitors (Vismodegib and Sonidegib) are approved for the systemic treatment of locally advanced basal cell carcinoma (laBCC). The objective response rate was the primary endpoint of the trials for both drugs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adult patients with laBCC treated with Sonidegib at the Dermato-Oncology Unit of IFO San Gallicano between June 2020 and September 2022 were included in the study. Patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics were recorded. The complete response rate was the primary outcome. The median time to the best response and complete response were the secondary outcomes. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and dose adjustments were recorded. RESULTS: Of the 19 patients included in the study, eight (42.1%) achieved a complete response, seven (36.8%) had a partial response, and four experienced progressive disease (21%). The median time to the best response was 3 months in the group of patients with partial response (range 2.0-4.0, with three patients not evaluable) and 3.5 months in the group of patients with complete response (range 2-5). TRAEs occurred in 14 (73.6%) patients, with 8 (57.1%) reporting ≤2 TRAE categories and 6 (42.8%) >2. A total of 78.9% of patients received a modified treatment schedule; 12.5% of patients who achieved a complete response received full dosage from the beginning to the end of treatment, compared with 27.3% of those with a partial response. CONCLUSIONS: The associations between the clinical outcome of interest (objective response rate) and the clinicopathological and treatment characteristics were evaluated. No statistically significant association was observed. Our analysis confirms the observation that no statistically significant correlation exists between clinical response and Sonidegib alternate dose regimen.

Treatments on the horizon for locally advanced basal cell carcinoma.

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is one of the most common human cancers. Most cases of BCC are amenable to surgical and topical treatments with excellent prognosis if diagnosed timely and managed appropriately. However, in a small percentage of cases, it could be locally advanced BBC (laBCC) and not amenable to surgery or radiation, including recurrent, large tumors or tumors that invade deeper tissue. Hedgehog inhibitors (vismodegib and sonidegib) are approved as the first-line treatment of laBCC. PD-1 inhibitor immunotherapy (cemiplimab) is indicated for cases that progressed on or could not tolerate hedgehog inhibitors or when hedgehog inhibitors are contraindicated. Given the modest response and bothersome side effects of some of the agents above, there are reports of novel treatments, and clinical trials are currently evaluating multiple agents.

Efficacy of photodynamic therapy using ALAHCl in gel with a lipid nanoemulsion and MALHCl in cream in superficial basal cell carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a therapeutic option for low-risk basal cell carcinoma (BCC). The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy of topical PDT in the treatment of superficial BCC (sBCC) using two different photosensitizers: aminolevulinic acid hydrochloride (ALA-HCl) in a gel formulation with a lipid nanoemulsion (ALA-HCl in gel) and ALA methyl ester hydrochloride (MAL-HCl) in a cream formulation (MAL-HCl in cream). MATERIAL AND METHODS: 21 patients were treated twice with a one week interval between treatments. The formulations were applied onto lesions: 10 patients were treated with MAL-HCl in cream, and 11 with ALA-HCl in gel. After three hours of incubation and removing the preparations, fluorescence was assessed. The skin areas were then irradiated with red light 630 ± 5 nm. RESULTS: At the follow-up visit 12 weeks after the second treatment, complete clinical remission was found in 82% after ALA-HCl in gel and in 80% after MAL-HCl in cream. An excellent cosmetic result was found in 96% of patients after MALHCl in cream and in 100% after ALA-HCl in gel. Faster skin healing and less post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation during follow-up visits was observed after treatment with ALA-HCl in gel. CONCLUSIONS: Both formulations - ALA-HCl in gel and MAL-HCl in cream - were highly effective photosensitisers for PDT. The advantage of ALA-HCl in a gel formulation with a lipid nanoemulsion was faster skin healing, resulting in better cosmetic results.

Ablative fractional laser treatment reduces hedgehog pathway gene expression in murine basal cell carcinomas.

This study aimed to investigate the impact of ablative fractional laser (AFL) on hedgehog pathway gene expression in murine microscopic basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) and compare these results to the effect of topical treatment with vismodegib, an FDA-approved hedgehog inhibitor. In 25 mice, 1 cm2 skin test sites (n = 44) containing microscopic BCCs were exposed to one of three interventions: a single CO2 AFL treatment (1 pulse, 40 mJ/microbeam, wavelength 10.6 µm, 5% density, pulse rate 250 Hz, n = 12), eight topical vismodegib treatments (3.8 mg/mL, n = 8), or combination of AFL and vismodegib treatments (n = 9). Untreated controls were included for comparison (n = 15). After 4 days, skin samples were analyzed for hedgehog gene expression (Gli1, Gli2, and Ptch1) by qPCR and vismodegib concentrations by liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (data analyzed with two-tailed t-tests and linear regression). A single treatment with AFL monotherapy significantly reduced hedgehog gene expression compared to untreated controls (Gli1 72.4% reduction, p = 0.003; Gli2 55.2%, p = 0.010; Ptch1 70.9%, p < 0.001). Vismodegib treatment also reduced hedgehog gene expression (Gli1 91.6%; Gli2 83.3%; Ptch1 83.0%), significantly surpassing AFL monotherapy for two out of three genes (Gli1, p = 0.017; Gli2, p = 0.007; Ptch1, p = 0.15). AFL and vismodegib combination mirrored the effects of vismodegib monotherapy (Gli1, p = 0.424; Gli2, p = 0.289; Ptch1, p = 0.593), possibly due to comparable cutaneous vismodegib concentrations (mean ± SD, vismodegib monotherapy 850 ± 475 µmol/L; combination 1036 ± 824 µmol/L; p = 0.573). In conclusion, a single AFL treatment significantly reduced hedgehog gene expression in murine BCCs mimicking the effects of eight topical applications of vismodegib. Further studies are needed to assess whether AFL can be utilized for BCC treatment, either as monotherapy or in combination with other drugs.

Laser-assisted topical delivery of vismodegib reduces hedgehog gene expression in human basal cell carcinomas in vivo.

BACKGROUND: Systemically delivered hedgehog inhibitors including vismodegib and sonidegib are widely used to treat basal cell carcinomas (BCCs). Ablative fractional laser (AFL)-assisted topical delivery of vismodegib has been demonstrated in preclinical studies. The aim of this explorative clinical study was to evaluate intratumoral vismodegib concentrations and effect on hedgehog pathway gene expression following AFL-assisted topical vismodegib delivery to BCCs. METHODS: In an open-label clinical trial, 16 nodular BCCs (in n = 9 patients) received one application of CO2 -AFL (40 mJ/microbeam, 10% density) followed by topical vismodegib emulsion. After 3-4 days, vismodegib concentrations in tumor biopsies (n = 15) and plasma were analyzed and compared with samples from patients receiving oral treatment (n = 3). GLI1, GLI2, PTCH1, and PTCH2 expression was determined by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (n = 7) and GLI1 additionally by in situ hybridization (n = 3). RESULTS: Following AFL-assisted topical administration, vismodegib was detected in 14/15 BCCs and reached a median concentration of 6.2 µmol/L, which compared to concentrations in BCC tissue from patients receiving oral vismodegib (9.5 µmol/L, n = 3, p = 0.8588). Topical vismodegib reduced intratumoral GLI1 expression by 51%, GLI2 by 55%, PTCH1 and PTCH2 each by 73% (p ≤ 0.0304) regardless of vismodegib concentrations (p ≥ 0.3164). In situ hybridization demonstrated that GLI1 expression was restricted to tumor tissue and downregulated in response to vismodegib exposure. CONCLUSION: A single AFL-assisted topical application of vismodegib resulted in clinically relevant intratumoral drug concentrations and significant reductions in hedgehog pathway gene expressions.

Dynamic optical coherence tomography evaluation in locally advanced basal cell carcinoma during sonidegib treatment.

BACKGROUND: Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common cancer in the Caucasian population. It has a multifactorial pathogenesis, in which constitutive activation of the Sonic Hedgehog signalling (SHH) pathway (via mutations in PTCH1 or SMO genes) represents by far the most common genetic aberration. The introduction of vismodegib and sonidegib, two SHH pathway inhibitors, changed the therapeutic approach of locally advanced and metastatic BCCs. EADO's (European Association of Dermato-Oncology) new staging system refers to these as 'difficult-to-treat' BCCs. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to evaluate sonidegib's effectiveness in patients affected by difficult-to-treat BCCs by using non-invasive diagnostic techniques. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 14 patients (4 females, 10 males; mean age 77 ± 11 years) affected by difficult-to-treat BCCs treated with oral sonidegib 200 mg/day that were followed with total body videodermoscopy (V-Track, Vidix 4.0) and dynamic optical coherence tomography (D-OCT, VivoSight Dx) since May 2022. Considering the risk of rhabdomyolysis routine blood tests, especially for creatine kinase concentrations, were performed. All treated patients were inserted in the BasoCare database, which aims to offer support to patients taking sonidegib. Complete and partial responses were evaluated by the overall reduction of the number of lesions and their individual sizes. Safety was evaluated by assessing the occurrence and severity of adverse reactions. RESULTS: Eighty per cent achieved complete clearance and 75% reduction of diameter. D-OCT scans performed at every follow-up showed concordance with clinical appearance and demonstrated reduction of hyporeflective structures, that is, islets of tumour cells and overall improvement of morphology. CONCLUSION: Sonidegib can be considered an effective treatment option in cases where surgery or radiotherapy would be unfeasible or has previously failed, although pigmented lesions did not show complete clearance, suggesting that there are factors other than the SHH pathway involved in tumour growth. Videodermoscopy and D-OCT were useful in the quick and seamless follow-up of lesions and added valuable information in assessing efficacy.

Photodynamic Therapy in Treating a Subset of Basal Cell Carcinoma: Strengths, Shortcomings, Comparisons with Surgical Modalities, and Potential Role as Adjunctive Therapy.

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common skin cancer, for which there are multiple treatment options, including the gold standard Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS), surgical excision, electrodesiccation and curettage, radiation therapy, cryosurgery, and photodynamic therapy (PDT). While PDT is currently approved for treating actinic keratosis, it has been used off-label to treat BCC patients who may not tolerate surgery or other treatment modalities. We present a review of the efficacy of these modalities and describe important considerations that affect the usage of PDT and MMS. ALA-PDT and MAL-PDT are both efficacious treatment options for lower-risk BCC that can serve as non-invasive alternatives to surgical excision with favorable cosmetic outcomes in patients unsuitable to undergo surgery. In particular, PDT may be considered an adjuvant for the prevention and treatment of BCC lesions in patients with some genetic syndromes such as Gorlin syndrome, and in combination with surgical excision in lesions presenting in certain locations. Limitations to PDT include lack of margin control to prevent recurrence, pain, and cost of certain photosensitizers. Future studies should investigate the role of PDT as adjunctive therapy, standardization of protocols, and causes and ways to address recurrence following PDT treatment.

Photodynamic therapy with BF-200 ALA gel for the treatment of actinic keratosis, Bowen´s disease and basal cell carcinoma in long term immunosuppressed patients after organ transplantation.

Continuous immunosuppression after organ transplantation is associated with an increased risk of developing keratinocyte neoplastic lesions. Topical photodynamic therapy represents a therapeutic approach for different keratinocyte neoplastic lesions. However, the specific efficacy and safety of this treatment in this immunocompromised population remains largely unknown. In this case report series, we show the efficacy and safety of photodynamic therapy with BF-200 ALA gel using red-light and daylight in immunocompromised patients. Out of 8 patients presented here, 1 was treated for 8 basal cell carcinomas, 1 for 2 Bowen´s disease lesions and 6 were treated for field cancerization including 4 to 10 actinic keratoses. Treatment response rates were above 75 %. The adverse events, including pain, did not differ from those already described for PDT. These data suggest that PDT with BF-200 ALA gel could be an effective and safe option to add to the treatment portfolio for neoplastic keratinocyte lesions in this high-risk population.

Surgery after sonidegib treatment achieves complete response in locally advanced basal cell carcinoma of the face.

Basal cell carcinoma accounts for 75% of skin cancers worldwide and is the most common malignancy in Caucasians. Since chronic ultraviolet exposure is the major risk factor for its development, sun-exposed areas such as the face are frequently affected. The gold-standard treatment is surgical excision. Radiotherapy may be considered in selected cases such as unresectable primary tumors. In some patients, when the risk of a significant functional/cosmetic deficit advises against both surgery and radiotherapy, target therapy (hedgehog pathway inhibitors) can be administered alone or in a neoadjuvant setting, to reduce the tumor size and make it eligible for surgery. Vismodegib as a neoadjuvant treatment before surgery has been investigated in a single, multicentre, open-label, phase II trial (VISMONEO); however, sonidegib has not yet been evaluated in this setting. We report the cases of two patients with locally advanced basal cell carcinoma of the face who achieved complete remission with sonidegib followed by a more limited surgical excision than would have been needed without target therapy.

Final analysis of phase II results with cemiplimab in metastatic basal cell carcinoma after hedgehog pathway inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Metastatic basal cell carcinoma (mBCC) is a rare condition with no effective second-line treatment options. Cemiplimab is an immune checkpoint inhibitor that blocks the binding of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) to its ligands, programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and programmed death-ligand 2 (PD-L2). Here, we present the final analysis of cemiplimab in patients with mBCC after first-line hedgehog pathway inhibitor (HHI) treatment (NCT03132636). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this open-label, single-arm, phase II study, adults with mBCC and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤1, post-HHI treatment, received cemiplimab 350 mg intravenously every 3 weeks for ≤93 weeks or until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) by independent central review (ICR). Duration of response (DOR) was a key secondary endpoint. Other secondary endpoints were ORR per investigator assessment, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), complete response rate, safety, and tolerability. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients were enrolled: 70% were male and the median age of patients was 64 [interquartile range (IQR) 57.0-73.0] years. The median duration of follow-up was 8 months (IQR 4-21 months). The ORR per ICR was 22% [95% confidence interval (CI) 12% to 36%], with 2 complete responses and 10 partial responses. Among responders, the median time to response per ICR was 3 months (IQR 2-7 months). The estimated median DOR per ICR was not reached [95% CI 10 months-not evaluable (NE)]. The disease control rate was 63% (95% CI 49% to 76%) per ICR and 70% (95% CI 56% to 82%) per investigator assessment. The median PFS per ICR was 10 months (95% CI 4-16 months); the median OS was 50 months (95% CI 28 months-NE). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were fatigue [23 (43%)] and diarrhoea [20 (37%)]. There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Cemiplimab demonstrated clinically meaningful antitumour activity, including durable responses, and an acceptable safety profile in patients with mBCC who had disease progression on or intolerance to HHI therapy.

Photodynamic therapy for nodular basal cell carcinoma up to 5mm located on high-risk area: Effectiveness and long-term follow-up results.

SIGNIFICANCE: Response rates evaluation of photodynamic therapy (PDT) for nodular basal cell carcinoma (BCC) treatment located on high-risk and low-risk areas of the face. APPROACH: Two groups of nodular BCC were selected, debulked, and received 20% methyl aminolevulinate (MAL) hydrochloride cream. After 3 h, the first irradiation was performed (20 min, 150 J/cm2). Then, the cream was re-applied, and a second irradiation was performed after 1.5 h (20 min, 150 J/cm2). Clearance at 30 days and recurrence-free survival rate were evaluated. RESULTS: The clearance at 30 days after PDT was 89% for the low-risk area group and 87% for the high-risk group. The recurrence-free survival at 60 months was 82% and 85% for the high-risk and low-risk groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences were observed between groups nor for clearance at 30 days, nor recurrence-free follow-up. These results make PDT possible option for nodular BCC less than 5 mm located in high-risk areas.

Long-term follow-up results of a pilot study for nodular basal cell carcinoma with PDT using partial home treatment protocol.

SIGNIFICANCE: Evaluate a photodynamic therapy (PDT) protocol for low-risk basal cell carcinoma (BCC) treatment that requires less time spent at the hospital and is less painful. APPROACH: Eight BCCs were selected, debulked, and received 20 % methyl aminolevulinate cream. After 3 h, the first irradiation was performed at the hospital (20 min, 150 J/cm2). Then, the cream was re-applied, and a portable irradiation prototype was fixed to the skin around the lesion. After 1.5 h, the patients turned on the prototype for irradiation at home (for 2 h, totalizing 312 J/cm2). Disease-free survival rate and pain score during irradiations were evaluated. RESULTS: The clearance at 30 days after PDT was 87.5 % by histological analysis. The mean follow-up was 21.5 months and the recurrence-free survival at 22 months was 75 %. The pain score was significantly lower at home. CONCLUSIONS: A potentially less painful and more comfortable PDT treatment protocol with proven long-term efficiency is presented. A randomized clinical trial has been conducted to confirm these results.

Cryosurgery and 5-Fluorouracil Combination Therapy for Treatment of Bowen's Disease and Superficial Basal Cell Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC), which includes both Bowen's disease (BD) and superficial basal cell carcinoma (sBCC), is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in Canada. BD and sBCC are amenable to minimally invasive treatments however, large-scale studies assessing long-term outcomes are lacking, particularly regarding the timing and duration of non-invasive combination treatments. OBJECTIVE: Examine the clinical cure rate of BD and sBCC using a combination treatment consisting of a single cycle of cryotherapy followed by a three to four-week course of topical 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). METHODS: Retrospective chart review at a single center. Inclusion criteria included histology-proven sBCC or BD treated with either a combination protocol, cryosurgery, or 5-FU alone. RESULTS: 310 biopsy-confirmed cases of BD and 176 biopsy-confirmed cases of sBCC were analyzed. Of these, 229 cases of BD and 61 cases of sBCC were treated with cryosurgery and immediate 5-FU application, yielding a clearance rate of 90% and 86.9% at 6 months from initial treatment. CONCLUSION: Cryosurgery followed by immediate 5-FU use may be an effective mode of treatment for BD and sBCC, negating the need for invasive procedures and allowing for increased accessibility. Further studies with longer follow-up intervals, comparisons with other non-invasive treatments, and evidence of histologic cure are required. J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(12):1166-1171. doi:10.36849/JDD.7378.

Non-Surgical Therapeutic Strategies for Non-Melanoma Skin Cancers.

OPINION STATEMENT: Non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) is a globally prevalent skin disease, with basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma accounting for 99% of NMSC cases. While surgical excision is the most common approach, numerous non-surgical therapies have rapidly advanced in recent years. In cases of low-risk NMSC, alongside surgical excision, priority should be given to physical therapy and photodynamic therapy. Physical therapy modalities, exemplified by electrodessication and curettage, emerge as safe and efficacious alternatives. In juxtaposition, photodynamic therapy, albeit relatively more costly, assumes preference for patients exhibiting heightened cosmetic concerns owing to the scarring risks inherent to physical therapy and surgical excision. Notably, the combination of curettage and photodynamic therapy has exhibited remarkable efficacy in the treatment of nodular basal cell carcinoma. Additionally, for elderly patients who may be intolerant to stimulation, modified photodynamic therapy offers an almost painless option. When surgery is unavoidable, photodynamic therapy can be a valuable adjunct, allowing for a more conservative surgical approach, either before or after the procedure. Radiotherapy holds a prominent role in comprehensive treatment strategies, especially for patients ineligible for surgical intervention or those with lesions precluding further surgical measures. In cases of NMSC exhibiting perineural invasion or lymphovascular involvement, adjunctive radiotherapy is advised; however, potential adverse effects necessitate careful consideration. For advanced NMSC cases where surgery and physical therapy fall short, immunotherapy provide viable solutions. Systemic therapy employing Hedgehog pathway inhibitors can be considered for patients with distant metastatic basal cell carcinoma, despite its low incidence, or individuals with locally advanced lesions who are not surgical candidates, or those encountering recurrences after resection and radiotherapy. However, close monitoring of disease progression and adverse reactions is crucial. In this evolving landscape of NMSC treatment, personalized and multidisciplinary approaches are key, ensuring optimal outcomes while prioritizing patient safety and satisfaction.

Immune microenvironment of basal cell carcinoma and tumor regression following combined PD-1/LAG-3 blockade.

Systemic treatment options for patients with locally advanced or metastatic basal cell carcinoma (BCC) are limited, particularly when tumors are refractory to anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1). A better understanding of immune checkpoint expression within the BCC tumor microenvironment may inform combinatorial treatment strategies to optimize response rates. CD3, PD-1, programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1), lymphocyte activation gene 3 (LAG-3), and T-cell immunoglobulin domain and mucin domain 3 (TIM-3)+ cell densities within the tumor microenvironment of 34 archival, histologically aggressive BCCs were assessed. Tumor infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) expression of PD-1, PD-L1, and LAG-3, and to a lesser degree TIM-3, correlated with increasing CD3+ T-cell densities (Pearson's r=0.89, 0.72, 0.87, and 0.63, respectively). 100% of BCCs (34/34) demonstrated LAG-3 and PD-1 expression in >1% TIL; and the correlation between PD-1 and LAG-3 densities was high (Pearson's r=0.89). LAG-3 was expressed at ~50% of the level of PD-1. Additionally, we present a patient with locally-advanced BCC who experienced stable disease during and after 45 weeks of first-line anti-PD-1 (nivolumab), followed by a partial response after the addition of anti-LAG-3 (relatlimab). Longitudinal biopsies throughout the treatment course showed a graduated increase in LAG-3 expression after anti-PD-1 therapy, lending support for coordinated immunosuppression and suggesting LAG-3 as a co-target for combination therapy to augment the clinical impact of anti-PD-(L)1.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of Hedgehog pathway inhibitors used in the treatment of advanced or treatment-refractory basal cell carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Sonidegib and vismodegib are currently the only US Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency-approved small-molecule Hedgehog pathway inhibitors (HHIs)for treating adults with advanced or refractory basal cell carcinoma (BCC) that is not amenable to conventional surgery or radiotherapy. At this time, there are no head-to-head clinical trials comparing these two HHIs for efficacy and safety to assist clinicians with determining which HHI may be best suited for their patients. AREAS COVERED: This review briefly describes the pathogenesis of BCC, provides a detailed overview of the key pharmacokinetic profile differences between sonidegib and vismodegib, explains their pharmacodynamics, and highlights the therapeutic considerations when either HHI is used to treat special patient populations. EXPERT OPINION: Although both HHIs act at the same molecular target in the Hedgehog pathway, there are significant differences in their pharmacokinetic profiles that may play a potential role in their efficacy and safety. Evidence-based recommendations serve to inform clinicians until direct comparative clinical trials of sonidegib versus vismodegib are conducted to determine the clinical relevance of the reported differences in their pharmacokinetic properties.

Signaling Pathways and Therapeutic Strategies in Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma.

Non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSCs) are the most common human neoplasms world-wide. In detail, basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most frequent malignancy in the fair-skinned population. The incidence of BCC remains difficult to assess due to the poor registration practice; however, it has been increasing in the last few years. Approximately, 85% of sporadic BCCs carry mutations in Hedgehog pathway genes, especially in PTCH, SUFU and SMO genes, which lead to the aberrant activation of GLI transcriptional factors, typically silent in cells of adult individuals. The management of advanced BCC (aBCC), both metastatic (mBCC) and locally advanced BCC (laBCC), not candidates for surgical excision or radiotherapy, remains challenging. The discovery of mutations in the Hh signaling pathway has paved the way for the development of Hh pathway inhibiting agents, such as vismodegib and sonidegib, which have represented a breakthrough in the aBCC management. However, the use of these agents is limited by the frequent occurrence of adverse events or the development of drug resistance. In this review, we thoroughly describe the current knowledge regarding the available options for the pharmacological management of aBCCs and provide a forward-looking update on novel therapeutic strategies that could enrich the therapeutic armamentarium of BCC in the near future.